Utahs Provo Canal Enclosure Will Save Water, Add To The Community Trail System
The 21-mile-long Provo Reservoir Canal, which has delivered water from the Provo River to farms and residents of northern Utah County for a century, is finally getting a significant makeover.


When the $130-million project to replace the open channel with a buried 126-in. steel pipeline is complete, area residents who have lived with the benefits and the hazards of the canal will have a new walking and equestrian trail; water users will have a much-improved system; and endangered fish in the Provo River will have more water.
The channel, known locally as the Murdock Canal, snakes its way along the eastern bench of northern Utah County, just south of the Salt Lake Valley. It has been delivering water since 1911. But officials at the Provo River Water Users Association (PRWUA), which owns and operates the canal, realized that if the major water artery were to continue to serve the growing population of the region, changes would have to be made.
The unlined canal was losing up to 10% of its water through seepage and evaporation. And the likelihood of more accidents—22 people have drowned in the canal over its history—was expected to increase along with the development that was occurring adjacent to its banks.
Keith Denos, general manager of PRWUA, says plans to enclose the channel have been “on the drawing boards” for at least 12 years. And they likely would have stayed there if not for the coordinated efforts by a wide range of stakeholders, including the canal's owners, wildlife conservation groups and the residents of half a dozen cities and towns that border the corridor.
“In 1995 we did a master plan for capital improvements [the PRWUA also operates a reservoir and several other canals], and on that list, enclosing the canal was the most expensive and far reaching,” Denos says. “We said it was a nice idea for some day, and it was put on the shelf.”
The estimated price tag for the project was nearly $150 million.
Water Savings
But the possibility of saving water and keeping it in the Provo River system drew the attention of members of the Central Utah Water Conservancy District (CUWCD) and the Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District, which operate extensive water infrastructure systems both south and north of the PRWUA.
“In 1998 the Central Utah district came to us and proposed to pay half the project cost in return for rights to the water that would be saved,” Denos says.
Enclosing the canal will save an estimated 8,000 acre-ft of water a year, the owner says. The savings will increase water in tributaries to the Provo River, which will support efforts under way to preserve some endangered fish species.
As plans neared completion, representatives from the seven cities that border the canal approached PRWUA to build a trail on top of the pipeline.
Steve Cain, facilities and land manager for the PRWUA, says providing public access to the canal right-of-way had been proposed in the past but rejected because of the liability. “People have been pushing for a trail almost for the entire existence of the canal, but we have been resistant because we didn't want to invite people where there is a water hazard like this,” Cain says. “As we looked at enclosing the canal, that possibility opened up.”
Representatives from the conservancy districts went to work with the Utah congressional delegation and other agencies in Washington and were able to secure $17.5 million for the trail.
Watertight
Cain says more than 500 utilities intersect with the canal right-of-way and have to be relocated or replaced in the enclosure project. An agreement between the cities and the PRWUA put the relocation work under the control of general contractor Ames Construction, Salt Lake City.
According to Adam Murdock, engineer-of-record for project designers CH2M HILL (and coincidentally, a great grandson of the canal's namesake), designs for a concrete box culvert were also done, but the final choice was for a pipeline. Murdock says the pipe is more flexible in the event of an earthquake, always a concern along the Wasatch Front, and it provides increased, higher-pressure flow.
“We are welding all the joints on the pipe, and so in the end it will be 100% watertight,” Murdock says.
He points to a unique design feature—the use of new plunger valves to control water pressure in the pipe. “We used them because the elevation drop from the beginning of the pipe to the end is about 90 feet, and to get it to flow that far, we can't have much head loss,” he says. “We have these specifically designed plunger valves that, when open, produce minimal head loss. They should extend the life of the flow-control facilities we are planning to put in operation about a year from now.”
Higher Flows
The decision to enclose the canal in a steel pipe had other benefits for the community, Cain says. Northwest Pipe Co., located in nearby Pleasant Grove, was awarded the contract to manufacture all 21 miles of pipe, providing a local economic boost.
The spiral pipe is 7/16 in. thick and produced in 40-ft sections weighing about 23,000 lb each.
The inside of the pipe is coated with polyurethane to prolong its life and allow for a swifter water flow. The original canal managed flows of about 550 cu ft per second, but the new pipe can handle flows up to 623 cfs, Cain says. In the trench, the pipe will rest on a layer of “flowable fill,” a malleable light concrete material pumped in after joints are welded. The flowable material fills the bottom half of the trench, then is topped with sand and soil and will eventually be paved with asphalt for the trail.
Don Brummel, western region construction manager for Ames, says much of the material to cover the pipe has been reclaimed on site. “We are doing the crushing, and we have a batch plant on site,” he says. “We have an outside supplier helping with extra flowable fill, but we are providing the rest of it.”
The contract contains incentives to complete the project in spring 2012, and Brummel says crews are on target for early completion.