OSHA Issues Long-Awaited Crane Safety Rule
In one of the most important federal construction safety actions in years, the Labor Dept.'s Occupational Safety and Health Administration has issued a sweeping new rule aimed at reducing deaths and injuries involving construction cranes.
OSHA says that the rule, released July 28, will affect about 267,000 construction and crane rental companies and certification organizations that together employ about 4.8 million workers.
The 1,070-page revised standard for Cranes and Derricks in Construction replaces a 1971 regulation and is "long overdue," says Labor Secretary Hilda Solis.
Most provisions of the new rule will take effect Nov. 8. One key provision, a new requirement that construction-crane operators must be certified, will become effective in 2014.
David Michaels, the assistant secretary of labor in charge of OSHA, says, "We think this will make an important contribution in saving lives," for workers as well as for passers-by near construction sites.
OSHA estimates that the regulation will prevent 22 fatalities and 175 non-fatal injuries per year.
One major new mandate in the rule is the institution of certification requirements for crane operators, Michaels told reporters in a July 28 conference call. He says operators will be required to be certified for the type of equipment they are using
Other crane-related workers, including riggers, will have to be qualified.
He also said that one change from OSHA's July 2008 proposed rule is that the final version clarifies "that our rules do not preempt state and local requirements."
In addition, the regulation includes new mandates for working around power lines.
Several 2008 fatal crane accidents in New York and other cities had an effect on some aspects of the regulation.
For example, Michaels says the rule includes provisions dealing with synthetic slings, a product that he says was not in use when the previous crane rule was issued 40 years ago. He says the new regulation requires synthetic slings to be used in accordance with manufacturers' instructions, during assembly and disassembly.
Another new requirement in the rule is that tower-crane parts will have to be inspected before the crane is erected. Michaels says a tower-crane part was associated with one of the New York accidents.
The rule has been long in the works. In 2003, OSHA assembled a advisory committee composed of 23 crane specialists, including representatives from various parts of the industry and from labor unions. That group produced a consensus on crane regulatory provisions in July 2004.
But a formal proposed rule didn't come out until October 2008 and now, some 21 months after that, the final rule is out.
OSHA also held a July 28 Web chat answering dozens of detailed and general questions from interested parties about the new crane rule.
Would this new rule have prevented the terrible accidents in Manhattan in 2008? I doubt it...<br/><br/><a href="http://enr.ecnext.com/coms2/article_polg100728JudgeClearsR" rel='nofollow...
http://enr.ecnext.com/coms2/article_polg100728JudgeClearsR
OSHA's Michaels cited two provisions in new rule that relate to NY 2008 crane accidents--synthetic slings and inspection of tower-crane parts before crane erection.<br/>--Tom Ichniowski
--Tom Ichniowski
Do Crane Regulations need to be more controlled. Yes, but 1070 pages worth of discussions and rules? Completely absurd. <br/><br/>
Why does it always take a bunch of deaths to rectify these issues? Is OSHA able to be PROACTIVE???? It seems there are many areas that can be made safer by simply educating and certif...
Its about time ! yay ! but the requirement for certification won't go into affect until 2014 ? why so long ? whats the reason for waiting 4 more years ? I don't get it, I thought we wer...
The majority of crane accidents that I am familiar with are caused the same way most other accidents are caused - people either do not know the standards or decide to ignore the standar...
I would like to think that this rule and others like it (Miami Dade County) would have prevented the tragedy that occurred on March 25th, 2008 in Miami which took the life of two good m...
I've written a manual on the management of tower cranes, for our company. California laws, specifically Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations, already require a lot of what is ...
I don't know yet what this new standard says, but there are still a lot of issues regarding cranes which are not addressed in the current regulations, such as having an evacuation plan and equipment readilly accessable in the event that an operator in a tower crane becomes physically incapacitated, or needs to exit the crane at a time when the tower ladder cannot be used (for example during a structure fire), seismic performance criteria for tower cranes (many have fallen as a result of seismic events), specific non-destructive testing requirements as part of the certification process (as of now, visual inspections of welds, is considered to be a non-destructive procedure). I would advocate that all critical welds which are painted should be subject to magnetic particle testing and critical lift regulations which can be applied to tower cranes. It is an evolving field, and with the budget and funding processes the way they are, work like this is often slow in coming or only comes after the need for it becomes painfully clear.
As far as evacuation plans go for tower cranes go check out a general contractor named PCL they made a video and require a plan for all job sites always above and beyond all standards r...
Accidents involving cranes get a lot of press because they usually result in catastropic damage or loss of life but there are other jobsite related incidents that cause more injuries an...
The document is double spaced so there is considerably fewer than 1070 real pages.<br/><br/>Academic? perhaps but the document should at least be looked at before commenting. I have th...
Academic? perhaps but the document should at least be looked at before commenting. I have the feeling that the document is relying too much on well
intentioned "experience" and not nearly enough on science.
For example when factors of safety" so called" of 5 or even 10 are tossed about is it any wonder
that some believe that standards are ultraconservative when they actually may not be.
I have no brief for so called "synthetic" slings but is NYC doing the right thing in banning them?
What I wound like to see ultimately is the replacement of "inspectors" by professionals who can
make qualified judgements these can come from the existing inspector class as the inspectors
get gradually university engineering education. The construction industry desperately needs much
more professionalism..
OSHA has done a good job of avoiding specific titles, labels, and qualifications, and placing the the employer to be responsible for determining the qualifications and training needed f...
Although most lifts are safely made by experienced and responsible field riggers and operator, there remain lifts that should be engineered by a qualified person, whether an engineer or not. These lifts are not always a function of weight or percentsage of chart, but on local conditions that may raise the red flag. As a full-time Rigging Engineer, I strongly advocate engineers and supervisors who have any involvemnent in lifting operations, whether self-performed or by a sub-contractor, to develop a stong understanding of the lifting process, the equipment involved, and the ability to review lift plans or even to prepare them.