Sponsored Content
Build Roads That Anticipate Errors
SANT
Every year brings a sad anniversary to my family. Early one March morning in 1986, I received a call from my weeping mother saying that Sandra, my younger sister, had just been involved in a serious auto accident. We didn’t know if she would live through the night. I took the next flight to Boston and rushed to the hospital.
I did not make it in time. My last goodbye was to my beautiful young sister’s cold and broken body. And 40,000 times each year, families make such heartbreaking farewells to other crash victims.
The drunk driver who killed Sandra survived with a few scratches. We learned he had been arrested 17 times for drunk driving and that fines, license revocations and even jail time didn’t help him.
The question facing our society is how to prevent such tragedies.
Behavior-changing campaigns do stop some drunk driving, but they have no effect on others or on someone who simply falls asleep at the wheel or who swerves to avoid something in the road and crosses into oncoming traffic.
Last year, the Pacific Institute for Research & Evaluation unveiled a groundbreaking research report, “On a Crash Course: The Dangers & Health Costs of Deficient Roadways.” Its key finding? Each year, bad road conditions are a contributing factor in more than half of all U.S. crashes and cost the nation more than $217 billion.
The report upset some well-intentioned but misguided road- safety advocates. Why? Because it made a forceful case for placing greater emphasis on building safer roads, which seemed to threaten advocates for so-called behavior-changing campaigns designed to reduce impaired driving and increase seat-belt use.
However, the number of vehicular accidents on our highways demands a much more robust campaign. We need an infrastructure that is capable of “forgiving” errant driving and errant behavior.
In the transportation community, the much-touted policy goal of “Vision Zero” or “Towards Zero Deaths” is catching on around the world. What is not known by many is the reasoning behind this idea, which was developed in Sweden in 1997. The Swedish approach is to build and manage roadways that anticipate human error and mitigate the consequences. “What we must realize is that we have a fundamental problem with road safety all over the world—that is, we have put the blame on the victims,” wrote Patrick Magnusson, who heads Sweden’s Vision Zero Academy. “Those who designed the system have never had full responsibility. We want to change this.”
That, in essence, is the same conclusion reached in “On a Crash Course,” a study commissioned by the American Road and Transportation Builders Association and the Transportation Construction Coalition. Dr. Ted Miller, the study’s primary author, called for replacing non-forgiving poles with breakaway poles, using brighter and more durable pavement markings, adding rumble strips to shoulders and mounting more guardrails or safety barriers; then, over time, add or widen shoulders, improve roadway alignment, replace or widen narrow bridges, reduce pavement edges and abrupt drop-offs, and clear more space adjacent to roadways.
Of course, we must make sure drivers accept responsibility for their actions. But collectively, the public and private sectors of the transportation design and construction industry should work to ensure that when drivers make mistakes, they, along with innocent passengers and motorists, do not pay for those errors with their lives.
The road where Sandra was killed is a typical rural two-lane road with no shoulders. Median barriers would have prevented the drunk driver from crossing into on-coming traffic and hitting her head-on. A longer sight distance might have allowed Sandra to see him coming earlier. A wide shoulder and clear zone might have given her a place to avoid the collision.
As the House and Senate continue discussions on the next highway bill, now is the time for the federal government to significantly boost investment in an ever-aging infrastructure network and dedicate increased funding for roadway safety improvements. It may help to spare others the tragedy from which no family, including my own, can ever recover.
Thank you for having the courage to share your tragic personal experience in this well written article. This will bring much more attention to the issue than the facts and statistics. ...
A well-argued article based on painful personal experience. There's a growing body of research showing how drivers interpret environmental cues, such as the closeness of buildings and p...
My deepest sympathies for your loss.<br/><br/>The loss was not related to lack of completely uneconomic solutions like a median barrier on all rural road with no shoulders......it was a...
The loss was not related to lack of completely uneconomic solutions like a median barrier on all rural road with no shoulders......it was a lack of enforcement and detention of a known criminal.
The solution is one of social engineering not civil engineering.
Considering our current and future economic situation it is more than likley that we are entering an era of questioning if we can afford maintenance of all of the infrastructure that we have built, let alone improving every road in the US to a higher standard.
