The Personality Traits Needed for the New Risk Managers
Until now very little research has been carried out into the definition of the personality traits that make a great risk manager and whether their skills need to change to meet emerging challenges. We have surveyed risk managers from a wide range of industries and areas. The survey results showed that, though the majority of today’s risk managers have characteristics that conform to the stereotype, there are many more dimensions to risk managers than first thought.
The research itself was straightforward. We invited risk professionals from around the world to take part by completing an online confidential psychometric survey.
We based it on the well-established DISC profiling methodology, which classifies individuals on two axes—proactive/reactive and introvert/extrovert—and places people into one of the four resulting personality quadrants: proactive introverts, proactive extroverts, reactive introverts and reactive extroverts.
Over 1,000 risk managers sent back responses.
The traditional view of risk managers is that they must be analytical and cautious, numerate, precise and principled. They must show good judgment and be capable of collecting, recording and processing large amounts of data in a methodical way. Risk managers should be able to present risk data in the context of corporate governance, risk and compliance needs. Often they have been unkindly viewed as the “guys from the department of no,” who sat somewhat separately from the rest of the business.
The New Characteristics
The survey results showed that, though the majority of today’s risk managers have characteristics that conform to the stereotype, they have other characteristics, too.
It was apparent, even from the first batch of survey results, that 60% of risk managers had psychometric profiles that matched or incorporated the traditional characteristics associated with the role. This percentage stayed constant even as the sample size increased and became more diverse in terms of nationalities and industries.
The personality traits commonly associated with risk managers fall into the DISC methodology ‘Reactive Introvert’ category. Reactive introverts are viewed as experts, capable of demonstrating strong analytical skills and applying logic and caution to deal with often complex subjects where accuracy and precision are essential.
Lacking the ability to win people over to their viewpoint, could traditional risk managers be holding their companies back?
Most people are a blend of personality traits, and nearly one of every three survey respondents classified as reactive introverts also had proactive characteristics.
The remaining 40% of risk managers surveyed were proactive extroverts, evangelists, with natural communication and social skills and capable of using an endless supply of argument and charm until the task is achieved. Significantly, they are also prone to exaggeration.
![]() |
ROBERTSHAW |
A related type, proactive introverts, are hard-driving individuals determined to see a project brought to a successful conclusion. These drivers are demanding and do not take no for an answer. They sort issues on the fly and sometimes break the rules. As drivers, such people are needed to embed a risk culture and drive change through organizations.
Their skills will be needed increasingly as businesses become more risk mature and take an enterprise-wide view in addition to using the skills provided by the traditional risk manager “technician,” the reactive introvert.
So we see that there is room for a significantly greater variety of skills and personality types within the risk management function than has previously been acknowledged. Senior management has to be clear in what it is trying to achieve through the risk function and build an appropriate team to support this need.
What worked in the past may no longer be appropriate to meet future needs as the organization’s risk maturity increases.
As cultural change programs and communications become more important, “traditional” risk management skills will not be enough and a mixture of personalities may be needed. That could also lead to conflict and irritation among team members. Everyone on the team will have to work to be more self-aware and ensure that the unit acts as a cohesive team.
Peter Robertshaw is the senior vice president of corporate communications for Active Risk, a provider of enterprise risk management solutions based in Herndon, Va. He can be reached at peter.robertshaw@activerisk.com.
Sociology is among the weakest sciences. Among its weaknesses is the concept<br/>of ingrained personality which can be carried to an extreme. Additionally the survey suffers from report...
of ingrained personality which can be carried to an extreme. Additionally the survey suffers from reporting bias and selection bias and neglects the cultural environment. A Government engineer regardless of personality characteristics will be a lot more cautious than a private industry engineer even when it is apparent that the policy is now shown to be wrong and causing harm eg the "swine flu" epidemic. The environment matters.
What is needed in my view is not so much as finding the "right" personality types for the job at hand as finding individuals with good intelligence,good education and good motivation to do a good job. Knowing Bayes theorem regardless of personality "type" is a real big plus.
Incidentally I recall reading somewhere that psychometrical tests that purport to measure "leadership" have been shown to be worthless.
I am the author of this opinion piece.<br/><br/>You make some good points, but let me give you some more background to our research. <br/><br/>The DISC profiling methodology used in our...
You make some good points, but let me give you some more background to our research.
The DISC profiling methodology used in our survey is a well respected psychological profiling tool which has been used since the middle of the last century. It's a simple fact that the DISC tool is commonly used by HR departments to help in hiring, promotions and team building. Our survey highlights the fact that the demands put on risk managers are changing and the profession is still maturing.
The requirements for more 'mature' professions are well understood - for examples, the demands placed on accountants and auditors are much more well understood and homogeneous between organizations. Our research is trying to highlight the different personality types currently found in the profession. It also alerts organizations to the fact that the demands they may make on their risk managers as individuals or teams is likely to change over time. Sometimes they'll focus on diligent, number crunchers, other times they'll have more of a need for the communicators who can sell the value of risk management to project and program managers. Trying to put a 'square peg into a round hole' could be disastrous for the company and the individual. Building flexible risk management teams with a mix of personality types seems the best solution.
Download our full survey report here: http://connect.activerisk.com/risk-manager-survey-report/