New York State Court lawsuit exhibit An aerial view of the excavation for Barclays Center in New York City entered as an exhibit in Laquila's lawsuit against Hunt. A New York State judge has ruled that Laquila Construction Group, the excavation and foundation subcontractor for the Barclays Center arena in Brooklyn, can sue prime contractor Hunt Construction Group for additional payment even though Laquila signed releases when it accepted progress payments during the project.The arena open on time in September 2012.New York City-based Laquila filed a complaint against Hunt in state court in Brooklyn in May, 2013. Although Hunt paid
Related Links: New Hollywood Map Shows Two Projects Atop Active Fault Millennium Hollywood On July 1, the California State Geological Survey started mapping the Santa Monica fault in Los Angeles, part of almost 2,000 miles of unmapped fault lines. The project could delineate new earthquake zones and restrict future developments in the state.CSGS was able to ramp up its mapping efforts weeks after Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed the state's $156.3-billion budget, which includes $1.49 million this year for fault zoning and $1.3 million in dedicated annual funding. State officials had been under increased pressure to provide fault-line data to
Related Links: Text of Supreme Court NLRB v. Noel Canning decision (majority and concurring opinions) High Court Rules Against Obama on NLRB Recess Appointments Nation's High Court Hears Recess Appointment Case (enr.com 1/14/2014) [subscription] The National Labor Relations Board will be poring over more than 400 decisions, from 2012 and 2013, in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's unanimous June 26 ruling that President Obama exceeded his authority in naming three members to the board during a three-day break between Senate sessions.But the court's unanimity about that judgment veils a split. Five justices signed on to the majority opinion.
Related Links: Copy Of Class-Action Lawsuit Elk River Chemical Spill Triggers Lawsuits, Investigations A uniquely designed airport built in 1947 in Charleston, W.Va., has been swept up in the flurry of litigation surrounding a January incident that spilled 10,000 gallons of chemicals into the Elk River, contaminating the water supply of over 300,000 residents in nine counties. The federal class-action lawsuit, filed on June 20 in Southern West Virginia District Court, claims Triad Engineering and excavation contractor Cast & Baker were environmentally negligent on a Yeager Airport runway extension project, finished in 2011.The 10 residents and four businesses listed in
Related Links: Text of court's decision in NLRB v. Noel Canning Supreme Court to Hear NLRB Recess-Appointment Case (enr.com 6/25/2013) [subscription] The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled unanimously that President Obama exceeded his authority when he named three members to the National Labor Relations Board in January 2012 during a three-day break between Senate sessions.But the court’s unanimity about that judgment thinly veils a split. Five justices signed on to the majority opinion. The other four, though concurring that Obama went beyond his powers, said the majority should have gone much further in limiting presidential authority.The ruling calls into question
Photo Courtesy Sunflower Electric Power Corp. Utility's proposal would add 895- MW unit to the 362-MW Holcomb station. Related Links: Kansas Power Operator Will Challenge Air-Quality Decision Kansas Governor Vetoes Project A coal-fired powerplant project in Kansas that had been curtailed because of environment-based opposition has received a renewed lease on life with approval by the state's top environmental regulator. But the plant's opponents are not discouraged and cite many obstacles the project must overcome before ground can be broken.On May 30, the Kansas Dept. of Health and Environment (KDHE) issued the air-quality-permit addendum for the 895-MW Holcomb 2 powerplant
Related Links: Court's June 23 Opinion: Feb. 24, 2014 transcript of oral arguments The U.S. Supreme Court on June 23 said that the Environmental Protection Agency had exceeded its authority when it rewrote sections of the Clean Air Act to regulate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from large stationary sources.Nevertheless the court also upheld EPA’s authority to regulate GHG emissions for the largest sources of air pollution.The ruling means that EPA does not have the authority to regulate powerplants, refineries, and other large emitters of pollutants under CAA’s Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) or Title V provisions simply because they emit
Sunflower Electric Power Corp. Utility's proposal would add 895 MW to existing Holcomb 1 station, rated at 362 MW. Related Links: Kansas Power Operator Will Challenge Air-Quality Decision Kansas Governor Vetoes Project A coal-fired powerplant project in Kansas that has been repeatedly left for dead because of environment-based opposition has received a renewed lease on life from approval by the state’s top environmental regulator. But the plant’s opponents are not discouraged, and they cite many obstacles the project must overcome before ground can be broken.On May 30, the Kansas Dept. of Health and Environment (KDHE) issued the air quality permit
Shale gas pipe and valves in Pennsylvania, similar to those shown in the photo above, were at the heart of a costly contract dispute. ENR Art Dept. Faced with mounting interest after losing a $24-million jury verdict in Delaware County, Pa., a pipeline company late last week reached a settlement with contractor Utility Line Services, says the attorney for the contractor.The jury in April had ordered the defendant, PVR Marcellus Gas Gathering Inc., which was recently acquired by Dallas-based Regency Energy Partners, to pay Utility Line Services about $16.5 million for the amount it was owed. Another $7.8 million was
Related Links: Supreme Court Reverses 9th Circuit in L.A. Water Pollution Case August 2013 opinion by 9th Circuit Court of Appeals The U.S. Supreme Court declined to take up an appeal to a controversial Clean Water Act case that has pitted the County of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District against the Natural Resources Defense Council and Santa Monica Baykeeper.The case, initiated by the environmental groups in 2008, already has been before the nation's high court. In January 2013, the court ruled on a narrow question: whether polluted water pumped from one part to another part