ENR 2021 Top 200 Environmental Firms
The Top 200 Environmental Firms have never been more bullish about their prospects, as decarbonization of economies, attention to legacy pollution problems and infrastructure shortfalls and funding now create new mandates for global government and businesses’ environmental, social and governance (ESG) agendas.
Please email ENRT200env@enr.com to be added to the Top 200 Environmental Firms email list for the 2022 survey filing, or to ask questions. The approximate Top 200 eligibility floor is $20 million in environmental services revenue for the prior year.
More detailed information on ENR's Top 200 Environmental Firms:
View complete 2021 list, with full market analysis
Current Top 200 Environmental Firms Story:
2021 Top 200 Environmental Firms: Market is Whirlwind of Change
Click below for earlier editions:
2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004
Asterisks (**) indicate firm was not ranked on the 2021 Top 200 list.
Type of Firm: Designation based on the largest % of 2021 environmental services revenue in categories described below. Multiple listings appear if the largest % of revenue is evenly split between two or more categories or is within 5%.
DES Engineering and/or design; CSL Consulting and/or studies; CON Construction, contracting and/or remediation; CM-PM Construction management and/or program management; EQP Equipment or device manufacture; OPS Contract operations; R&D Technology and/or research and development, OTH Services not already designated.
Would you like to have this ENR Top List in Excel with revenue and sector data? Click here.
ENR 2021 Top 200 Environmental Firms
| RANK 2021 | RANK 2020 | FIRM | TYPE OF WORK |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ** | Veolia Environmental S.A., Aubervilliers, France | OPS |
| 2 | 2 | Jacobs, Dallas, Texas | CSL |
| 3 | 1 | AECOM, Los Angeles, Calif. | DES |
| 4 | 3 | Tetra Tech Inc., Pasadena, Calif. | CSL |
| 5 | ** | Fluor, Irving, Texas | CON |
| 6 | 4 | Bechtel, Reston, Va. | CON |
| 7 | 5 | Mortenson, Minneapolis, Minn. | CON |
| 8 | 6 | WSP Global Inc., Montreal, Quebec, Canada | CSL |
| 9 | 8 | Stantec Inc., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada | DES |
| 10 | 9 | HDR, Omaha, Neb. | DES-CSL |
| 11 | 7 | webuild SpA, Milan, Italy | CM-PM |
| 12 | 11 | SUEZ North America, Paramus, N.J. 1 | OPS |
| 13 | 10 | Garney Holding Co., Kansas City, Mo. | CON |
| 14 | 18 | Kiewit Corp., Omaha, Neb. | CON |
| 15 | 17 | Golder, Palm Beach Gardens, Fla. 2 | DES-CSL |
| 16 | 16 | Wood, Houston, Texas | CON |
| 17 | 15 | U.S. Ecology Inc., Boise, Idaho | OPS |
| 18 | 12 | Black & Veatch, Overland Park, Kan. | DES |
| 19 | 21 | Leidos, Reston, Va. | OPS |
| 20 | 14 | ERM, London, England, U.K. | CSL |